Private beta · For litigators and investigators
Practice Law,
Not Paperwork.
IntelliClerk researches the law before it writes a word, drafts from the record you upload, and asks you only what the file cannot answer. Work product you can defend.
Firms of 1–20 attorneys · State and federal courts · Civil, criminal and investigations
On file in Commonwealth v. Ruiz
- 3 Case Documents Read
- 2 Discovery Items Analyzed
- 1 Statement of Facts Entered
produce
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Plaintiff,
v.
MATEO A. RUIZ,
Defendant.
Case No. CR-2026-00418
Motion to Suppress
I. Statement of Facts
On 14 February 2026, Officer Danvers initiated a traffic stop of the Defendant’s vehicle on Route 123. The dash camera recording produced in discovery begins forty seconds after the stop was initiated.
Complete
Exhibit A · Drafting
Draft from the record,
not from a blank page.
Open a matter, upload the file, and IntelliClerk drafts from what is in it — the agreement’s actual language, the dates in the treatment records, the admissions in the other side’s production — in the form the court you are filing in expects.
Complaints, motions and responses, motions to suppress, demand letters, and reports of investigation. It does not fill a gap with something plausible: a fact the record does not hold comes back to you as a question, and a point the law does not support is left out and reported, never written.
Try the Demo-
1
Add the record
Your client’s documents first, then what the other side produced. Every file is read on upload, scans included.
-
2
Enter the facts and draft
The clerk researches the decisions of your jurisdiction first, reads the opinions, and writes only what the authority supports.
-
3
Answer once, then file
What neither the record nor the law could settle comes back in one list, Addressables, before you see the draft. Answer it, and the finished draft opens — ready for a Word filing copy.
Every brief carries its status
- Awaiting Facts
- In Progress
- Needs Clarification
- Complete
Exhibit B · The Record
Read the file once.
Then stop re-reading it.
Everything you upload is read on arrival — PDFs, Word files and scanned pages — and becomes part of what every draft on the matter draws from.
A fact in an arrest report or a sworn answer never has to be typed into the facts a second time. When the draft relies on it, it names the document: the paragraph of the agreement, the Bates number of the record. Where your facts and the record disagree, it asks which is right.
Try the DemoArrest Report
As the draft uses it
The arrest report gives a defective brake lamp as the ground for the stop at 8:41 p.m. (Arrest Report at 2). The narrative attached to the same report gives weaving within the lane instead (id. at 9). The report never reconciles the two.
- Parties Commonwealth · M. Ruiz
- Stop time 20:41, 14 Feb 2026
- Conflict Two stated grounds for the stop
Exhibit C · Discovery, with Fathom
See what the production says.
And what it leaves out.
Discovery arrives as a pile. Upload it and Fathom reads it against the matter on its own: what it shows, where it contradicts itself or the sworn answers, and what should be in the box and is not.
The omissions are the part that is genuinely hard to do by hand, because it means noticing the absence of a document nobody has mentioned. Fathom works from what the produced material references and flags every thread that stops — and the draft reads what it found.
Try the DemoKey highlights
- Dash camera footage begins forty seconds after the stop was initiated.
- The incident narrative and the arrest report state different grounds for the stop.
Omissions and gaps
- No calibration records produced for the breath instrument.
- Body camera footage referenced in the narrative is not in the production.
Recommended next steps
- Move to compel the calibration log and the body camera footage.
- Carry the forty-second gap into the suppression argument.
Exhibit D · Investigations
Reports of investigation
that hold up when challenged.
For attorneys who investigate: workplace complaints, internal inquiries, and administrative and inspector-general matters.
Upload the interview notes, the records and the policies, and IntelliClerk drafts the Report of Investigation — each allegation, the evidence on it, and a finding stated against the standard of proof, every one tied to the document it rests on. Where the evidence is thin, the report says so rather than reaching, and Addressables lists what you would still need before signing.
Request an InvitationAllegation 1 · Substantiated
- Overtime approved for hours not worked on six dates in March (Timesheets, Ex. 7; badge records, Ex. 9).
Allegation 2 · Not substantiated
- No record or witness places the supervisor at the March 14 meeting (Interview of R. Okafor, Ex. 3).
Before signing
- Badge records for April were requested and have not been produced.
Why it holds up
Work product
you can defend.
Most drafting tools write first and check afterward. IntelliClerk works the way a careful associate does: the research comes first, and nothing is written that the research did not support.
Research before writing
The clerk names the legal questions, searches the decisions of your jurisdiction, and reads the opinions. A proposition no court is found stating is left out of the draft and reported to you, not written and hoped for.
Every citation checked
Each citation is matched to a real decision in a reporter index, and the Case Law tab shows the court’s own words for each rule it is cited for. Later history is yours to run in your citator, as it should be.
Read as opposing counsel would
Crosscurrent reads every draft from the other side: the arguments and authority you should expect, and where the draft is thinnest, before anyone else finds it.
- One list of questions Everything the clerk needs from you arrives once, in Addressables, before the draft — not as a stream of interruptions.
- Facts from the file What the draft takes from the record it names, and where your facts and the record disagree, it asks.
- In Word and PowerPoint Add-ins check the citations in any document you open, insert a draft into your own pleading, and build the hearing deck from the brief.
- Dictate the facts Tell the clerk what happened the way you would tell a colleague. The recording is transcribed and not kept.
Try the demo
Walk through a live matter.
Three steps on a seeded Virginia matter — Commonwealth v. Ruiz, Circuit Court, Fairfax County. Choose the brief to draft, read the record it draws from, then read the draft itself with every record citation and authority linked back to its source.
Sample record only. No account, no bar number, and nothing you do touches client data.
- 1 — Choose the brief
- 2 — Review the record
- 3 — Read the draft
Pricing
One subscription.
Twenty matters a month.
No seat licences and no annual commitment. One price covers the firm and the first twenty matters you work each month.
The firm
$199/month
Up to twenty matters handled each month, for every attorney in the firm. Drafting, citation verification, Crosscurrent, Fathom discovery analysis, reports of investigation, and the Word and PowerPoint add-ins.
Over twenty matters
+$99/month
Billed only in a month when the firm handles more than twenty matters. A quieter month goes back to the base price.
Enhanced Analysis and Review
+$99/month
Three documents a month reviewed under attorney supervision, with final sign-off by a Trireme attorney, returned within two business days. Additional documents $49 each. You remain counsel of record.
- Unlimited drafts A matter carries as many drafts, revisions, and adversarial reviews as the work takes. Nothing is metered by the draft.
- Unlimited seats Add every attorney and paralegal in the firm at no additional cost. Matters are the unit, not people.
- Month to month No contract and no minimum. Cancel and your matters stay readable and exportable for ninety days.
- Refer a colleague Know another attorney who would use IntelliClerk? Send us their name before they sign up. When they subscribe, you both get a month free.
A firm working twelve matters pays $199 a month, or $298 with Enhanced Analysis and Review. Beta firms are not billed during the beta.
Request an Invitation
The beta is small
on purpose.
IntelliClerk is open by invitation to litigators and investigating attorneys at firms of up to twenty. We take a few firms at a time so we can sit with each one through onboarding and the first real filing.
- Who Civil and criminal litigators, and attorneys who conduct investigations, at firms of one to twenty attorneys, in good standing with their state bar.
- Where State and federal courts. Coverage is deepest today in Virginia, New York and California; tell us where you file and we will tell you plainly what is ready there.
- Then We verify your bar admission before an invitation goes out. Expect to hear back within five business days.